What is a Healthy Church? Pt. 7
Mark Seven—Biblical Church Discipline
What is Church discipline? What comes to mind? When most people think of Church discipline they think of something that is unpleasant, they think of punishment, they think of The Scarlet Letter, the Salem witch trials, and legalistic judgmental people. But is that accurate? Is that a fair representation of biblical Church discipline? I think not.
Church discipline is more than simply “unpleasant punishment”. There are both positive and negative aspects of Church Discipline. Jay Adams, in his book Handbook of Church Discipline, describes that there are preventive and corrective aspects of church discipline. Others distinguish between formative and corrective discipline. The word discipline itself comes from the word disciple, which simply means a learner or follower. The word involves the idea of knowledge, education, learning and order. Some kind of order is necessary for knowledge and learning to flourish. Yes, we can learn by chance and circumstances, but when there is some structure and order, learning can flourish. So, we need to broaden our understanding of Church Discipline.
Formative or preventive discipline speaks of the way in which the study, teaching, and preaching of Scripture serve to shape and mold the Christian by standards and principles. Consider a portion of 2 Tim 3:16: “All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable for teaching…and for training in righteousness.” Some examples of formative discipline would be: Preaching on doctrine and its practical application the Christian life or teaching on various subjects of the Christian life and practice (marital roles, parenting, giving, evangelism, communication, etc.). Consider the various calls in Scripture to love one another, stir one another up to love and good deeds, and encourage one another. This is the “teaching them to obey everything I have commanded you” part of the Great Commission (Matt 28:20). The vast majority of discipline that occurs in the Church is formative discipline.
Poor, shallow teaching, preaching, or studying will have a negative impact on this kind of discipline. It will result in poor formative discipline.
“When Christians are fed a regular diet of truth from the Scriptures in such a way that they grow by it, there will be far less need for remedial discipline in the church.” Jay Adams, Handbook of Church Discipline, p.22-23
Think about the implications of this for a minute. At the heart of strong formative or preventive discipline are strong preaching, teaching and studying of Scripture! Formative discipline will impact corrective discipline. Poor teaching, preaching, and study results in poor formative discipline, which results in a much greater necessity for corrective discipline.
Corrective discipline involves confronting individuals with the Scripture to turn them from error to righteousness. Returning to 2 Tim 3:16, we also see that: “All Scripture is breathed out by God and profitable…for reproof, for correction”. Notice that the starting point for this discipline is the same as with formative discipline; Scripture. In both cases, the essential element is God’s Word. Examples of corrective discipline are found in several very important passages of Scripture. In Hebrews 12:1-14 we find that corrective discipline is sometimes painful, it is necessary, it is evidence of our Father’s love for us, it has kind intentions, it “yields the peaceful fruit of righteousness”, and, ultimately, it’s aim is the glory of God through holiness (v.10). In Matthew 18:15-17 we learn that corrective discipline starts with Scripture, which defines the sin with which we are to confront our brother. We learn that if it is between another Christian it should be dealt with privately at first. The aim is repentance, restoration, the good of the person, but most importantly the aim is the glory of God! In 1 Corinthians 5:1-11 we learn that notorious and/or gross sin is dealt with publicly. Yet, again we learn that one of the aims is restoration: “so that his spirit may be saved in the day of the Lord.” (v.5b) Mark Dever comments on this passage as follows:
“that man was deeply deceived. He thought he could be a Christian while deliberately disobeying the Lord…Paul says that such a person is deluded, and that in order truly to serve such a deluded person and to glorify God, you need to show him the falsity of his profession of faith in light of the way he is living.” Dever, Nine Marks of a Healthy Church
Again, it is clear from the passage that the aim is the glory of God and the protection of the church, which is only manifest when the Church is distinct from the world, not like the world: “Cleanse out the old leaven that you may be a new lump, as you really are unleavened. For Christ, our Passover lamb has been sacrificed.” (v.7) After all, the Church is intended to display the glory of God!
In Galatians 6:1 we learn something about the spirit in which corrective discipline ought to be carried out.
“Brothers, if anyone is caught in any transgression, you who are spiritual should restore him in a spirit of gentleness. Keep watch on yourself, lest you too be tempted.”
In other words, corrective discipline ought to be conducted with a spirit of gentles and humility.
“When one brother trespasses against another, the offended brother is not to divulge the offense, but to go in a gospel way to the offender, and to use his endeavor to reclaim his brother; and if he repents, the offended brother ought to forgive him, Matt 18:15; Luke 17:3.” Benjamin Griffith, A Short Treatise Concerning a True and Orderly Gospel Church (1743) in Polity
This gives us a working framework for the biblical importance of both formative and corrective discipline in the local church. There are other examples of corrective discipline which also could be considered in examining this subject (2 Thess 3:6-15; 1 Tim 1:20; 5:19-20; Titus 3:9-11).
The historical practice of church discipline also demonstrates its priority in the church. For example, church discipline has been viewed, historically, as the third mark of a church:
Belgic Confession: The marks by which the true Church is known are these: If the pure doctrine of the gospel is preached therein; if she maintains the pure administration of the sacraments as instituted by Christ; if church discipline is exercised in punishing of sin; in short, if all things managed according to the pure Word of God, all things contrary thereto rejected, and Jesus Christ acknowledged as the only Head of the Church. Hereby the true Church may certainly be known, from which no man has a right to separate himself.
Historic Baptists have written lengthy explanations of the order and practice of discipline.
“We judge it necessary that a Day monthly be appointed particularly for Discipline, and not to manage such affairs on the Lord’s-day, which should be spent on the publick Worship of God, of a different nature…tho in small Congregations perhaps a day in two or three Months may be sufficient.” Benjamin Keach, The Glory of a True Church and its Discipline Displayd’ (1697) England
“Quest. ‘How is a Church to proceed in case of open and notorious Scandals?’ The Answer is, ‘the matter of Fact, as such, being beyond all question; the Church is to proceed immediately to censure, to vindicate the Honour of Christ and his Church, and to manifest to the World their just Indignation against such Notorious Offenders, and wait for a well-grounded and tried Evidence of his true Repentance under that Ordinance of Christ which is appointed to that end.’” Keach, Ibid.
Many other works in historic Baptist documents reveal a commitment to the practice of Church Discipline.
“Southern Baptists excommunicated nearly 2 percent of their membership every year” in pre-Civil War days…their churches grew at twice the rate of the population growth.” Greg Wills, Democratic Religion
It is clear that church discipline was a common and necessary practice in the history of the church.
But why should churches practice Church Discipline? It seems so harsh and confrontational! The Most obvious answer is that it is biblical. Here are five reasons offered by Mark Dever
- For the good of the Person Disciplined (1 Cor 5:1-5; Gal 6:1; 1 Tim 1:20).
- For the good of other Christians, as they see the danger of sin (1 Tim 5:20).
- For the health of the church as a whole (1 Cor 5:6-8)
- “Paul tells the Corinthians that the lamb (Christ) had been slaughtered, and that they (the Corinthian church) were to be the unleavened bread. They were to have no leaven of sin in them. They, as a whole church, were to be an acceptable sacrifice.”
4. For the corporate witness of the church (Matt 5:16; John 13:34-35; 1 Cor 5:1; 1 Pet 2:12).
5. For the glory of God, as we reflect His holiness (Eph 5:25-27; Heb 12:10-14; 1 Pet 1:15-16; 2:9-12; 1 John 3:2-3). “That’s why we’re alive! (Gen 1:27; Lev 11:44a; 19:2; 2 Cor 6:14-7:1; 1 Pet 2:12; Col 1:21-22; Rev 22:15
- “Our lives are the storefront display of God’s character in His world. We cannot finally determine what others think of us, and we know that we are to expect such strong disapproval that we will even be persecuted for righteousness.
- “Greg Willis has written that, to many Christians in the past, ‘A church without discipline would hardly have counted as a church.’”
- “When discipline leaves a church, Christ goes with it.” John Dagg
How do members of the church contribute positively to the practice of church discipline? Consider the following principles:
- Receive the Word of God with meekness (James 1:21)
- Learn to recognize chastisement as evidence of God’s love (Heb 12:5-10).
- Humbly accept correction from others (Prov 27:5-6; 1:7).
- “We will walk together in brotherly love, as becomes the members of a Christian Church, exercise an affectionate care and watchfulness over each other and faithfully admonish and entreat on another as occasion may require.” Covenant
- Paul Tripp: “We need the loving courage of honesty and the humility of approachability.”
- Take seriously our responsibility to discipline others (Matt 18; 1 Cor 5)
- Don’t forget to rejoice (2 Cor 2:6; James 5:19-20)
It is obvious that formative discipline (teaching and training) is preferred over corrective discipline (correcting and reproving) in the mind of most people. It will serve us all well to be diligent in formative discipline, in order to diminish the need for corrective discipline. However, we will never remove the necessity of corrective discipline, altogether, for it is an instrument of grace in God’s arsenal of sanctification. Therefore, we must overcome the discomfort of biblical discipline through faithful obedience to the Lord, love for one another, and most importantly a supreme love for His glory.
